California producers approve dairy quota | eDairy News

California producers approve dairy quota

California dairy producers have voted in favor of a plan to retain their quota program if a federal milk marketing order is established for the state.

The California Department of Food and Agriculture released the results of a producer referendum on the quota Friday afternoon, showing that 87.2 percent of eligible voters voted in favor of the plan.

The department received 703 ballots with 613 in favor of the plan. Those in favor represent nearly 91 percent of the milk volume produced by eligible voters.

California dairy farmers have maintained that retention of a quota program, provided in their state order, was a critical component in moving ahead with their efforts to join the federal milk marketing order system.

That stand-alone quota program would operate outside of a potential federal order to continue the long-standing, producer-funded program that pays premiums to producers holding quota certificates.

The program pays quota certificate holders $1.70 per hundredweight above the state blend price for the amount of milk covered by their certificate. Those certificates are worth $1.2 billion dollars, an asset that can be transferred or sold.

California’s quota system came about in the late 1960s as a means to compensate milk producers selling into the higher Class I market and gain their support for establishing a state marketing order, which would pool milk and distribute payments more evenly to producers of milk across all utilizations.


Any claim arising from the information contained on the eDairy News website shall be submitted to the competence of the ordinary courts of the First Judicial District of the Province of Cordoba (Primera Circunscripción Judicial de la Provincia de Cordoba), Republic of Argentina, in the city of Córdoba, excluding any other jurisdiction (Federal jurisdiction is also excluded).


Criteria in the moderation of comments that eDairy News will take into consideration in all its publications.

  • They will not be considered insults of any kind against anyone,, whether a user, moderator or publisher. Complaints made with the name and surname of the author of the commentary will only be accepted after confirmation by the moderator.
  • Unsubstantiated and gratuitous destructive criticism or expressions of bad taste, whether offensive, racist or xenophobic.
  • SPAM, (Insert links to web pages not related to the subject, provide emails, etc...)
  • Comments that are meaningless with the footnote or the dairy sector.

Related posts