Processors split on dairy code | eDairy News

Processors split on dairy code

Fonterra’s managing director Rene Dedoncker has called for patience when it comes to any changes to the current dairy code.

‘‘We absolutely support the voluntary code and we just think it needs time to be tested,’’ he said.

‘‘We need to give it space, give it an amount of time so we know it works before they move to a mandatory code.

‘‘A mandatory code is a step too far, too soon, and will have unintended consequences that will make everyone risk-averse and potentially make more costs.’’

Despite costs also being an issue for Saputo chair Lino Saputo, he is in favour of the Australian Dairy Industry Council’s recommendations.

‘‘We continue to support the 11 points listed in the voluntary code of conduct put forth by ADIC, and believe this code should be mandatory for all processors — big and small,’’ Mr Saputo said.

‘‘We believe that a mandatory code of conduct should be managed by dairy industry bodies and the supplier community.

‘‘Our only concern in regards to a mandatory code of conduct is cost.

‘‘We want to ensure its regulation/enforcement isn’t onerous on the system.

‘‘We are ready and willing to support its implementation in any way we can.’’

Mr Saputo even provided a recommendation of his own.

‘‘We would also like to add a provision stating that step-downs (and claw-backs) should be illegal.’’

Dairy Connect chief executive Shaughn Morgan welcomed Mr Saputo’s views and hoped other processors would follow suit.

‘‘Dairy Connect will be reaching out to members to seek their views as to key points to be contained in a mandatory code. We will be doing this in the coming days,’’ he said.

‘‘Areas of concern would include transparency and certainty, dispute resolution, improving price signals, the ability to switch to new processors without penalty and written acknowledgement that all parties understood the terms of contracts.’’

Farmer Power executive officer Garry Kerr agreed with Mr Saputo.

‘‘With more and more evidence of contracting practices that are exploitive of dairy farmers, some possibly illegal, it is clear that the existing voluntary code is not working,’’ Mr Kerr said.

‘‘A mandatory code is needed to put some fairness back into the industry.’’

As part of its 18-month review into the industry, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission also called for the code to be mandatory.

The UDV is against a mandatory code, saying the ACCC’s review confirmed its concerns about the time a mandatory code would take to develop.

By: Rodney Woods

Source: Country News


Any claim arising from the information contained on the eDairy News website shall be submitted to the competence of the ordinary courts of the First Judicial District of the Province of Cordoba (Primera Circunscripción Judicial de la Provincia de Cordoba), Republic of Argentina, in the city of Córdoba, excluding any other jurisdiction (Federal jurisdiction is also excluded).


Criteria in the moderation of comments that eDairy News will take into consideration in all its publications.

  • They will not be considered insults of any kind against anyone,, whether a user, moderator or publisher. Complaints made with the name and surname of the author of the commentary will only be accepted after confirmation by the moderator.
  • Unsubstantiated and gratuitous destructive criticism or expressions of bad taste, whether offensive, racist or xenophobic.
  • SPAM, (Insert links to web pages not related to the subject, provide emails, etc...)
  • Comments that are meaningless with the footnote or the dairy sector.

Related posts