Reduction in farms converted to dairy

It comes as stronger rules promise to make intensive farming more difficult, alongside ongoing uncertainty about milk prices.

There were 20 consents granted relating to new dairy farms in the last financial year, Environment Canterbury (ECan) data shows.

It is nearly half last year’s figure, and a significant drop from the 110 consents granted in 2011.

The last time dairy conversion consents were that low was in 2007.

The number of dairy conversions can be derived from consent applications relating to dairy effluent, increasing herd size, or an amendment to an existing effluent consent.

The slowdown is likely partly due to incoming regional rules that put stricter limits on nutrient leaching, and require farmers to farm to good management practice.
Plan Change 5 was given indicative approval by the council in June. It is being appealed by multiple farming groups.

The rule change would mean the region had likely reached ‘‘peak cow’’, as it would make further dairy intensification difficult and may require some farms to downsize.
‘‘There has been a significant push in the past five years to measure, manage and reduce the effects of intensive farming, which includes dairying, across Canterbury,’’ ECan chief executive Bill Bayfield said.

‘‘What we are seeing is a reduction in the number of farms being converted to dairy, following several years of strong growth.’’
The plan change would likely impose significant costs on farmers.

In June, Mid-Canterbury Federated Farmers chairman Willy Leferink said it would make future dairy conversions unlikely.

Irrigation NZ called the rules ‘‘unachievable’’.

It may mark the end of dairy’s meteoric rise in Canterbury, which began two decades ago.

The number of dairy cows in

‘‘There has been a significant push in the past five years to measure, manage and reduce the effects of intensive farming . . .’’ ECan chief executive Bill Bayfield
Canterbury increased from 113,000 in 1990 to a peak of more than 1.3 million in 2014, Statistics NZ data shows. It was the country’s second-largest increase in dairy cattle numbers, behind Southland.

Canterbury tops the country in terms of intensity, however: the eight districts with the highest cow per hectare rates are all in Canterbury.

Hurunui has the highest with 3.56 cows per hectare, followed by Ashburton with 3.51. The national average is 2.85.

Canterbury also had the highest average herd sizes: Ashburton and Hurunui again have the highest, both with about 850 cows, double the national average.

The level to which dairy farming replaced traditional sheep farming in Canterbury is at the core of the environmental debate.

Nitrate levels are increasing in some parts of Canterbury. The greatest contributor to nitrate levels in New Zealand is urine from cows, the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment has found.

Industry group Dairy NZ said ECan’s consent figures showed there was no need to fear a significant increase in dairy farming.

Canterbury regional manager Virginia Serra said farmers were doing their utmost to protect the environment.

‘‘Dairy farmers in the region have farm environment plans which means they are set up to farm in an environmentally sustainable manner 365 days of the year,’’ she said.

‘‘Another major focus is on efficient water use, including good management of irrigation where more and more farmers utilise the latest technology water meters to ensure no more water is used than necessary.’’


Source: The Press


Any claim arising from the information contained on the eDairy News website shall be submitted to the competence of the ordinary courts of the First Judicial District of the Province of Cordoba (Primera Circunscripción Judicial de la Provincia de Cordoba), Republic of Argentina, in the city of Córdoba, excluding any other jurisdiction (Federal jurisdiction is also excluded).


Criteria in the moderation of comments that eDairy News will take into consideration in all its publications.

  • They will not be considered insults of any kind against anyone,, whether a user, moderator or publisher. Complaints made with the name and surname of the author of the commentary will only be accepted after confirmation by the moderator.
  • Unsubstantiated and gratuitous destructive criticism or expressions of bad taste, whether offensive, racist or xenophobic.
  • SPAM, (Insert links to web pages not related to the subject, provide emails, etc...)
  • Comments that are meaningless with the footnote or the dairy sector.

Related posts