Dairies, particularly in the Midwest, have been going through financial stress and spikes to milk hauling rates aren’t helping. For more on these stories watch the AgDay video above or read the following news brief links.
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email
Joel Fitzgibbon criticised the Federal Government for not having a mandatory code of conduct for the dairy sector in place and has called for it to be released ahead of the federal election. Picture: Andy Rogers

The latest AgLetter from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago indicates that dairy farmers in the Seventh District are going through significant financial stress.

“The biggest difference right now is the challenges that are faced in the dairy sector, particularly in Wisconsin, but also in Michigan,” says David Oppedahl, senior business economist for the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
Oppedahl says that this has caused land prices to slow down the valuation. Other states like Iowa and Indiana had gains in land value because of large corn yields.
Rising interest rates are also making it difficult on farmers in the five state region.
Milk Hauling Rates Jump in Upper Midwest
Rates for milk haulers in the Upper Midwest were reached 28¢/cwt in 2018, according to a study by the Upper Midwest Federal Milk Marketing Order. That’s a 40% increase since 2017 when the rate was 20¢/cwt. However, the rate charged in the region is still lower than other areas of the country and some states have larger price differences within the Upper Midwest.
“North Dakota has the highest average hauling charge (64¢ weighted average),” says Corey Freije, a dairy economist with Upper Midwest Order. “This result is from a low number of farms, the longest distance from high demand areas, and less handler competition. Wisconsin, in contrast, has a low average hauling charge (24¢ weighted average) with a high number of farms and close proximity to high-demand areas,” he says.

As U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration seeks to revive its ambitious social spending and climate plan in Congress, environmental groups and the farm industry are at odds over proposed subsidies aimed at offsetting agriculture’s substantial contribution to global warming.

You may be interested in

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

To comment or reply you must 

or

Related
notes

Cerrar
*
*
Cerrar
Registre una cuenta
Detalhes Da Conta
*
*
*
*
*
Fuerza de contraseña

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER