Push to extend mandatory dairy code to supermarkets could backfire – eDairyNews
Australia |25 octubre, 2018

Dairy | Push to extend mandatory dairy code to supermarkets could backfire

AUSTRALIA’S dairy industry has been warned it runs the risk of derailing the introduction of a mandatory code of conduct between farmers and processors, amid growing calls for it to cover supermarkets.

Some farm leaders and processors, including the nat­ional peak body Australian Dairy Farmers, called for the mandatory dairy code to be ­extended to supermarkets at a meeting with federal Opposition agriculture spokesman Joel Fitzgibbon this month.

But NSW Dairy Connect and Victoria’s Farmer Power lobby, who attended the meeting, opposed the move and claimed it was an ADF delaying tactic given the retail giants were already covered by the Food and Grocery Code of Conduct policed by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.

“It’s a smokescreen put up by ADF and processors to delay getting the mandatory (dairy) code in,” Dairy Connect president Graham Forbes said.

“We even had legal advice from a former ACCC lawyer at the meeting with Joel that you can’t extend the dairy code to supermarkets.”

Coles, Woolworths and Aldi signed on to the prescribed Food and Grocery Code of Conduct in mid-2015, which sets out an independent arbitration process, makes it illegal for the supermarkets to delist a supplier that makes a complaint and sets out minimum standards on payment, specifications for fresh produce and allocation of shelf space.

The Weekly Times understands ADF joined most processors at the Fitzgibbon meet­ing in calling for the code to be extended to supermarkets, with the backing of the United Dairyfarmers of Victoria.

When asked about its support, an ADF spokesman said the federation had “previously had policy that stated that a code of conduct should include the whole supply chain — farmers, processors and retailers”.

But the spokesman said “this has not been formally ­revisited since the introduction of the voluntary code in 2017 and now the support for a mandatory code.

“Any comments you may have heard from ADF would be along those historical lines, therefore we may need to take the opportunity to revisit this position and how the code would work in concert with the Food & Grocery Code.”

Farmer Power spokesman Alex Robertson said ADF and the processors were trying to “muddy the waters and string out” the delivery of a mandatory code”.

UDV president Adam Jenkins said the code should ideally cover retailers, given the headaches processors faced dealing with supermarkets.

But he said the UDV might have to accept the development of two separate codes if it meant major delays.

Legal notice on Intellectual Property in digital content

All information contained in these pages that is NOT the property of eDairy News and is NOT considered "in the public domain" by legal regulations, are trademarks of their respective owners and recognized by our company as such. The publication on the eDairy News website is made for the purpose of gathering information, respecting the norms contained in the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works; in Law 11.723 and other applicable norms.

Any claim arising from the information contained on the eDairy News website will be submitted to the jurisdiction of the Ordinary Courts of the First Judicial District of the Province of Córdoba, Argentine Republic, with a seat in the City of Córdoba, to the exclusion of any another jurisdiction, including the Federal.

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

Related news